SylabUZ
Nazwa przedmiotu | Political Sociology |
Kod przedmiotu | 14.2-WP-SOCDA-SPL |
Wydział | Wydział Nauk Społecznych |
Kierunek | Sociology |
Profil | ogólnoakademicki |
Rodzaj studiów | drugiego stopnia z tyt. magistra |
Semestr rozpoczęcia | semestr zimowy 2018/2019 |
Semestr | 2 |
Liczba punktów ECTS do zdobycia | 4 |
Typ przedmiotu | obowiązkowy |
Język nauczania | angielski |
Sylabus opracował |
|
Forma zajęć | Liczba godzin w semestrze (stacjonarne) | Liczba godzin w tygodniu (stacjonarne) | Liczba godzin w semestrze (niestacjonarne) | Liczba godzin w tygodniu (niestacjonarne) | Forma zaliczenia |
Wykład | 15 | 1 | - | - | Egzamin |
Ćwiczenia | 15 | 1 | - | - | Zaliczenie na ocenę |
To familiarize students with social determinants of politics, linkages of political processes, institutions of a political system and their social context. Ability of sociological analysis of the phenomena of political divisions and political conflicts and procedures of modern democracy.
-
Class: texts analysis, problem-solving discussion. Conventional lecture.
Opis efektu | Symbole efektów | Metody weryfikacji | Forma zajęć |
LECTURE ASSESSMENT
Form of assessment of lectures |
Remarks |
Grade |
Yes |
Written exam. |
In the form of open, problem-solving questions, The minimum requirements threshold is to obtain 50% of points from written work. |
The scope of the material on the exam. |
In accordance with the first course Syllabus (lecture + own diagnosis of a selected problem). |
Criteria for grade assessment |
Lecture grade is the exam grade. |
CLASSES PASS
Form of assessment of classes |
Remarks |
Grade |
Yes |
Written mid-term exam. |
Open questions. The minimum threshold requirements is to give at least 50% correct answers to the questions. |
Range of material covering the mid-term exam. |
In accordance with the Syllabus presented in the first meeting . |
Activity during classes |
Content-related preparation, the ability to provide examples, the ability to use the discussed texts. |
Criteria for grade assessment |
The class grade will be a weighted average from the written mid-term exam (80%) and activity in class (20%). |
FINAL GRADE*
Grades taken into account in the case of the final assessment. |
Remarks: |
Lecture + class graded. |
Positive grading of classes and lectures (3.0-5.0) is a condition for a final credit. |
Criteria for final assessment |
The final grade is an arithmetic mean of the grades of classes and a lecture* |
Norris P. (2014), Why Electoral Integrity Matters, Oxford University Press.
Norris P. (2017), Strengthening Electoral Integrity, Oxford University Press.
Dalton R.J., Welzel Ch. (2015), The Civic Culture Transformed. From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens, Oxford University Press.
Norris P. (2014), Electoral Engieneering. Voting Rules and Political Behavior, Cambridge University Press.
Democracy, Accountability, and Representation ed by Przeworski A., Stokes S.C., Manin B., Cambridge University Press 1999.
National and European? Polish Political Elite in Comparative Perspective, (ed.) Wesołowski W., Słomczyński K.M., Kjerulf Dubrow J., IFiS Publishers, Warszawa 2010.
Markowski R. (2000), Party System Institutionalization in New Democracies: Poland – a Trend-Setter with No Followers.
Kitschelt H. (1995), Formation of Party Cleavages in Post-Communist Democracies: Theoretical Propositions, [in:] Party Politics Vol 1. No.4 pp.447-472.
Mcmenamin I., Gwiazda A. (2011), Three roads to institutionalisation: Vote-,office- and policy-seeking explanations of party switching in Poland, [in] European Journal Of Political Research, October.
Kunovich R.M. (2000), The „Morning After”: Political Participation During Systemic Transformation [in:] Social Paterns of Being Political (ed.) Słomczyński K.M., IFiS Publishers, Warszawa.
Zmodyfikowane przez dr Dorota Bazuń (ostatnia modyfikacja: 02-05-2018 12:43)