SylabUZ
Nazwa przedmiotu | Issues of Social Diversity |
Kod przedmiotu | 14.2-WP-SOCDA-PZS |
Wydział | Wydział Nauk Społecznych |
Kierunek | Sociology |
Profil | ogólnoakademicki |
Rodzaj studiów | drugiego stopnia z tyt. magistra |
Semestr rozpoczęcia | semestr zimowy 2018/2019 |
Semestr | 3 |
Liczba punktów ECTS do zdobycia | 4 |
Typ przedmiotu | obowiązkowy |
Język nauczania | angielski |
Sylabus opracował |
|
Forma zajęć | Liczba godzin w semestrze (stacjonarne) | Liczba godzin w tygodniu (stacjonarne) | Liczba godzin w semestrze (niestacjonarne) | Liczba godzin w tygodniu (niestacjonarne) | Forma zaliczenia |
Wykład | 15 | 1 | - | - | Egzamin |
Ćwiczenia | 15 | 1 | - | - | Zaliczenie na ocenę |
The aim of the course is to familiarize students with selected issues related to social diversity issues both theoretical and empirical, and preparation to recognize and analyze contemporary issues of social differentiation.
-
Thematic scope of THE LECTURES:
Thematic scope of THE CLASSES:
The content of the lectures is transmitted through the use of such teaching methods as a conventional lecture, problem lecture and conversational lecture. Teaching methods used to implement the thematic scope of the classes include work with literature,multiple discussion, classic problem-solving method.
Opis efektu | Symbole efektów | Metody weryfikacji | Forma zajęć |
LECTURE ASSESSMENT
Form of assessment of lectures |
Remarks |
Grade |
Yes |
Written exam. |
In the form of open, problem-solving questions The minimum requirements threshold is to obtain 50% of points from written work. |
The scope of the material on the exam. |
In accordance with the Syllabus presented in the first meeting (lecture + class). |
Criteria for grade assessment |
Lecture grade is the exam grade. |
CLASSES PASS
FORM OF ASSESSMENT OF CLASSES |
REMARKS |
Grade |
Yes |
Activity during classes |
Content-related preparation, the ability to provide examples, the ability to use the discussed texts. |
Preparation of written work (student’s lecture, research report, etc.). |
Case analysis. Compliance with the topic, correct structure of work, language, reliability, independence of preparing work, proper selection of literature. The correct presentation, ability to answer questions about the presented material. |
Criteria for grade assessment |
The class grade is the grade of the written paper.
|
FINAL GRADE*
Grades taken into account in the case of the final assessment. |
Remarks: |
Lecture + class graded. |
Positive grading of classes and lectures (3.0-5.0) is a condition for a final credit. |
Criteria for final assessment |
The final grade is an arithmetic mean of the grades of classes and a lecture* |
Levinson M. (2014), No Citizen Left Behind, Harvard University Group, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London.
Piattoni S. (2010), The Theory of Multi-Level Governance: Conceptual, Empirical, and Normative Challenges,
Sherrod L. R., Torney-Purta J., Flanagan C. A. (2010), Handbook of Research on Civic Engagement in Youth.
Spoor M. (ed.) (2005), Globalisation, Poverty and Conflict. A Critical “Development” Reader, Springer Science, New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow.
Sullivan H., Skelcher C. (2002), Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Goldsmith S. (2010), The Power of Social Innovation: How Civic Entrepreneurs Ignite Community Networks for Good,
Mielczarek-Żejmo A. (2016), Formal framework for participation in municipalities of the Polish-German border region, [in:] “Rocznik Lubuski: Good Connections. Trust, cooperation and education in the mirror of social sciences”, vol. 2/2a.
Madanipour A., Cars G., Allen J. (eds.) (2003), Social Exclusion in European Cities: Processes, Experiences and Responses, Routladge, London.
Zmodyfikowane przez dr Dorota Bazuń (ostatnia modyfikacja: 02-05-2018 13:29)