SylabUZ
Nazwa przedmiotu | Sociology of Management |
Kod przedmiotu | 04.0-WZ-P-SMa-S19 |
Wydział | Wydział Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych |
Kierunek | WEiZ - oferta ERASMUS |
Profil | - |
Rodzaj studiów | Program Erasmus |
Semestr rozpoczęcia | semestr zimowy 2023/2024 |
Semestr | 1 |
Liczba punktów ECTS do zdobycia | 5 |
Typ przedmiotu | obowiązkowy |
Język nauczania | angielski |
Sylabus opracował |
|
Forma zajęć | Liczba godzin w semestrze (stacjonarne) | Liczba godzin w tygodniu (stacjonarne) | Liczba godzin w semestrze (niestacjonarne) | Liczba godzin w tygodniu (niestacjonarne) | Forma zaliczenia |
Wykład | 30 | 2 | - | - | Egzamin |
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
By the end of the course student should be able to:
use methods and techniques of group work
form desirable interpersonal relations
estimate the efficiency of subordinates’ work
manage the information
make a decision
solve problems in a creative way
organize personal work and work of subordinates
manage a change in organizations
-
During our course we will be focused on following issues:
Introduction to Sociology of Management
Organizational structures
Leadership in organizations;
Leadership in formal organizations
Leadership in informal organizations.
Motivation:
Emotive intellectuals.
Conflict in Organizations:
Sources of conflicts.
Positive & Negative Consequences of Conflict in Organizations.
Ways of Managing Conflict in Organizations.
Management diversity.
Employees Training and Development
Learning in Organizations
Organizational Human Resource Management
Work Anomie in an Organisation
- active participation in class
- one essay
- presentation in PPT format
Opis efektu | Symbole efektów | Metody weryfikacji | Forma zajęć |
GRADING POLICY:
The final grades will be given according to the following rule:
- the amount of the received points in the limits:
100 % - 75.1 % of total possible points corresponds to the grade 5 (A)
75.0 % - 70.1 % corresponds to 4.5 (B)
70.0 % - 65.1 % corresponds to 4 (C)
65.0 % - 60.1 % corresponds to 3.5 (D)
60.0 % - 50.1 % corresponds to 3 (E)
50.0 % - 0 % corresponds to 2 (F)
1. Class attendance and participations – students are to attend every class, fully prepared to participate in class discussions and activities 20%
2. Preparing an essay - 60% . Each student will prepare the essay and present some aspect of it to the class and lead the discussion.
3. Preparing of multimedia presentation – 20%. Each student will prepare the multimedia presentation about chosen problems of HRM.
Alan Price (2007) Human Resource Management in Business Context, 3rd edition, Thomson Learning Press.
Appreciating diversity – cultural and gender issues (2007), edited by Aneta Chybicka and Maria Kaźmierczak, 1ed edition,publisher “Impuls”.
Blanchard K., Johnson S.,(2001), One- minute manager
Blanchard K., Zigarmi P., Zigarmi D., (2008), One-minute manager and leadership: situational leadership and better communication between a supervisor and a subordinate
Blanchard K., Lorber R., (2008), One-minute manager’s techniques in practice
Baumer, E.P. (2007). Untangling research puzzles in merton’s multilevel anomie theory. Theoretical Criminology, 11(1), 63–93.
Manderscheid, S.V. & Arichvili, A. (2008). New leader assimilation: Process and outcomes. Leadership and Organization Development Journal,29, 661–677.
Mansfield, P. (2004). Anomie and disaster in corporate culture: The impact of mergers and acquisitions on the ethical climate of market organizations. Marketing Management Journal,14(2), 88–97.
McCloskey, D. (1976). Durkheim, anomie, and modern crisis. American Journal of Sociology, 81(6), 1481–1487.
Messner, S.F. (2003). An institutional-anomie theory of crime: Continuities and elaborations in the study of social structure and anomie. Cologne Journal of Sociology and Social Psychology,43, 93–109.
Vaughan, D. (1983). Controlling Unlawful Organizational Behavior: Social Structure and Corporate Misconduct.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chen, C.& Lee, H. (2007). Effects of transformational team leadership on collective efficacy and team performance. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 4, 202–217.
Chen, G.& Bliese, P.D. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology,87, 549–556.
Cohen, D.V. (1992a). The Dynamics of Powerlessness: Explaining Unethical Conduct in Business Organizations.Paper presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management Las Vegas, NV.
Cohen, D.V. (1992b). Ethical Choice in the Workplace: Situational and Psychological Determinants.Doctoral dissertation. Columbia University, New York, NY.
Jensen, L.& Wygant, S. (1990). The development of self-valuing theory: A practical approach for business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics,8, 215–225.
Bird, F. & Waters, J. (1987). The nature of managerial moral standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 1–3.
Jung, D.& Sosik, J. (2003). Group Potency and Collective Efficacy. Group Organization Management,28, 366–391.
Katz-Navon, T.& Erez, M. (2005). When collective and self-efficacy affect team performance. Small Group Research,36, 437–465.
-
Zmodyfikowane przez dr Paweł Szudra (ostatnia modyfikacja: 30-05-2023 10:57)